LSAC Resources - Data
LSATs Administered
| Year | June | % Chg | October | % Chg | December | % Chg | February | % Chg | Total | % Chg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987–1988 | 18,902 | 36,804 | 33,874 | 26,408 | 115,988 | |||||
| 1988–1989 | 23,064 | 22.0% | 40,577 | 10.3% | 42,564 | 25.7% | 30,883 | 16.9% | 137,088 | 18.2% |
| 1989–1990 | 22,088 | -4.2% | 43,274 | 6.6% | 44,044 | 3.5% | 29,459 | -4.6% | 138,865 | 1.3% |
| 1990–1991 | 25,677 | 16.2% | 49,957 | 15.4% | 42,685 | -3.1% | 34,366 | 16.7% | 152,685 | 10.0% |
| 1991–1992 | 24,211 | -5.7% | 50,077 | 0.2% | 43,588 | 2.1% | 27,691 | -19.4% | 145,567 | -4.7% |
| 1992–1993 | 24,778 | 2.3% | 46,491 | -7.2% | 41,533 | -4.7% | 27,252 | -1.6% | 140,054 | -3.8% |
| 1993–1994 | 23,061 | -6.9% | 46,359 | -0.3% | 38,982 | -6.1% | 23,626 | -13.3% | 132,028 | -5.7% |
| 1994–1995 | 21,880 | -5.1% | 42,927 | -7.4% | 39,670 | 1.8% | 24,076 | 1.9% | 128,553 | -2.6% |
| 1995–1996 | 20,336 | -7.1% | 38,406 | -10.5% | 36,368 | -8.3% | 19,646 | -18.4% | 114,756 | -10.7% |
| 1996–1997 | 19,055 | -6.3% | 36,020 | -6.2% | 30,953 | -14.9% | 19,287 | -1.8% | 105,315 | -8.2% |
| 1997–1998 | 20,010 | 5.0% | 34,399 | -4.5% | 29,879 | -3.5% | 19,703 | 2.2% | 103,991 | -1.3% |
| 1998–1999 | 18,933 | -5.4% | 33,558 | -2.4% | 32,116 | 7.5% | 19,629 | -0.4% | 104,236 | 0.2% |
| 1999–2000 | 20,448 | 8.0% | 36,540 | 8.9% | 30,731 | -4.3% | 19,434 | -1.0% | 107,153 | 2.8% |
| 2000–2001 | 20,151 | -1.5% | 37,847 | 3.6% | 30,111 | -2.0% | 20,921 | 7.7% | 109,030 | 1.8% |
| 2001–2002 | 23,908 | 18.6% | 46,745 | 23.5% | 38,045 | 26.3% | 25,553 | 22.1% | 134,251 | 23.1% |
| 2002–2003 | 27,808 | 16.3% | 52,604 | 12.5% | 41,887 | 10.1% | 25,715 | 0.6% | 148,014 | 10.3% |
| 2003–2004 | 27,471 | -1.2% | 53,701 | 2.1% | 41,215 | -1.6% | 25,230 | -1.9% | 147,617 | -0.3% |
| 2004–2005 | 28,600 | 4.1% | 50,386 | -6.2% | 41,985 | 1.9% | 24,287 | -3.7% | 145,258 | -1.6% |
| 2005–2006 | 25,984 | -9.1% | 49,197 | -2.4% | 40,023 | -4.7% | 22,240 | -8.4% | 137,444 | -5.4% |
| 2006–2007 | 24,879 | -4.3% | 48,171 | -2.1% | 41,033 | 2.5% | 25,965 | 16.7% | 140,048 | 1.9% |
| 2007–2008 | 25,103 | 0.9% | 49,785 | 3.4% | 42,250 | 3.0% | 25,193 | -3.0% | 142,331 | 1.6% |
| 2008–2009 | 28,939 | 15.3% | 50,721 | 1.9% | 43,646 | 3.3% | 28,092 | 11.5% | 151,398 | 6.4% |
| 2009–2010 | 32,595 | 12.6% | 60,746 | 19.8% | 50,444 | 15.6% | 27,729 | -1.3% | 171,514 | 13.3% |
| 2010–2011 | 32,973 | 1.2% | 54,345 | -10.5% | 42,096 | -16.5% | 25,636 | -7.5% | 155,050 | -9.6% |
| 2011–2012 | 26,812 | -18.7% | 45,169 | -16.9% | 35,825 | -14.9% | 22,152 | -13.6% | 129,958 | -16.2% |
| 2012–2013 | 25,223 | -5.9% | 37,780 | -16.4% | 30,226 | -15.6% | 19,286 | -12.9% | 112,515 | -13.4% |
Why not? (Provide additional feedback below. NOTE: If you have a question or concern regarding your specific circumstances, please go to the Contact Us page.)
Please enter a comment.
Thank you for your feedback.