LSAC Resources

 Research

Computerized Testing Reports

Computerized Testing Reports:

Alphabetical Listing of Current Computerized Testing Reports

Alternative Approaches to Updating Item Parameter Estimates in Tests With Item Cloning (CT 03-01)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

A Comparison of Item-Selection Methods for Adaptive Tests With Content Constraints (CT 04-02)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Computer Use and Preferences Among LSAT Takers (CT 05-01)
by Ann Gallagher, Andrea E. Thornton, Deborah A. Suto, and Christopher W. T. Chiu

Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests (CT 02-03)
by Wim J. van der Linden and Bernard P. Veldkamp, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Detection of Advance Item Knowledge Using Response Times in Computer Adaptive Testing (CT 03-03)
by Rob R. Meijer and Leonardo S. Sotaridona, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Equating an Adaptive Test to a Linear Test (CT 04-01)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Evaluating Equating Error in Observed-Score Equating (CT 04-03)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Final Report: LSAC Skills Analysis Law School Task Survey (CT 02-02)
by Stephen W. Luebke, Kimberly A. Swygert, Lori D. McLeod, Susan P. Dalessandro, and Louis A. Roussos

A Formal Characterization of and Some Alternatives to Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 02-05)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

The Impact of Item Parameter Estimation on Computerized Adaptive Testing with Item Cloning (CT 02-06)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Investigating the Quality of Items in CAT Using Nonparametric IRT (CT 04-05)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

A Method for Determining the Maximum Number of Nonoverlapping Linear Test Forms That Can Be Assembled From an Item Pool (CT 03-04)
by Ronald Armstrong, Rutgers Business School, Newark/New Brunswick, Rutgers University; and Dmitry Belov, Law School Admission Council

A Method to Determine Targets for Multi-Stage Adaptive Tests (CT 02-07)
by Ronald Armstrong, Rutgers University; and Louis Roussos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Modeling Nonignorable Missing Data Processes in Item Calibration (CT 04-07)
by Cees A. W. Glas and Jonald L. Pimentel, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Normal Models for Response Times on Test Items (CT 04-08)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Robustness of Person-Fit Decisions in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-06)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Routing Rules for Multiple-Form Structures (CT 02-08)
by Ronald D. Armstrong, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University

Survey and Usability Testing Results of the Analytical Reasoning Computerized Prototype at the 2000 Law School Recruitment Forums (CT 02-01)
by Kimberly A. Swygert, Susan P. Dalessandro, and Mike Contreras

Using Patterns of Summed Scores in Paper-and-Pencil Tests and CAT to Detect Misfitting Item Score Patterns (CT 02-04)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Violations of Ignorability in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-04)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Archived Computerized Testing Reports

LSAC has archived all Computerized Testing Reports that were published ten or more years ago. These reports are still available upon request.

Bookmark and Share

Was this page helpful? Yes No

Why not? (Provide additional feedback below. NOTE: If you have a question or concern regarding your specific circumstances, please go to the Contact Us page.)



E-mail address:

No Thanks

Please enter a comment.

Thank you for your feedback.

Get Adobe Reader to view PDFs indicated on this site by (PDF)