LSAC Resources - Research
Computerized Testing Reports
Alphabetical Listing of Current Computerized Testing Reports
Alternative Approaches to Updating Item Parameter Estimates in Tests With Item Cloning (CT 03-01)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Alternative Approaches to Updating Item Parameter Estimates in Tests With Item Cloning (CT 03-01) - Executive Summary
- Alternative Approaches to Updating Item Parameter Estimates in Tests With Item Cloning (CT 03-01) - Full Research Report (PDF)
A Comparison of Item-Selection Methods for Adaptive Tests With Content Constraints (CT 04-02)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- A Comparison of Item-Selection Methods for Adaptive Tests With Content Constraints (CT 04-02) - Executive Summary
- A Comparison of Item-Selection Methods for Adaptive Tests With Content Constraints (CT 04-02) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Computer Use and Preferences Among LSAT Takers (CT 05-01)
by Ann Gallagher, Andrea E. Thornton, Deborah A. Suto, and Christopher W. T. Chiu
- Computer Use and Preferences Among LSAT Takers (CT 05-01) - Executive Summary
- Computer Use and Preferences Among LSAT Takers (CT 05-01) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests (CT 02-03)
by Wim J. van der Linden and Bernard P. Veldkamp, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests (CT 02-03) - Executive Summary
- Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests (CT 02-03) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Detection of Advance Item Knowledge Using Response Times in Computer Adaptive Testing (CT 03-03)
by Rob R. Meijer and Leonardo S. Sotaridona, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Detection of Advance Item Knowledge Using Response Times in Computer Adaptive Testing (CT 03-03) - Executive Summary
- Detection of Advance Item Knowledge Using Response Times in Computer Adaptive Testing (CT 03-03) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Equating an Adaptive Test to a Linear Test (CT 04-01)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Equating an Adaptive Test to a Linear Test (CT 04-01) - Executive Summary
- Equating an Adaptive Test to a Linear Test (CT 04-01) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Evaluating Equating Error in Observed-Score Equating (CT 04-03)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Evaluating Equating Error in Observed-Score Equating (CT 04-03) - Executive Summary
- Evaluating Equating Error in Observed-Score Equating (CT 04-03) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Final Report: LSAC Skills Analysis Law School Task Survey (CT 02-02)
by Stephen W. Luebke, Kimberly A. Swygert, Lori D. McLeod, Susan P. Dalessandro, and Louis A. Roussos
- Final Report: LSAC Skills Analysis Law School Task Survey (CT 02-02) - Executive Summary
- Final Report: LSAC Skills Analysis Law School Task Survey (CT 02-02) - Full Research Report (PDF)
A Formal Characterization of and Some Alternatives to Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 02-05)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- A Formal Characterization of and Some Alternatives to Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 02-05) - Executive Summary
- A Formal Characterization of and Some Alternatives to Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 02-05) - Full Research Report (PDF)
The Impact of Item Parameter Estimation on Computerized Adaptive Testing with Item Cloning (CT 02-06)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- The Impact of Item Parameter Estimation on Computerized Adaptive Testing with Item Cloning (CT 02-06) - Executive Summary
- The Impact of Item Parameter Estimation on Computerized Adaptive Testing with Item Cloning (CT 02-06) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Investigating the Quality of Items in CAT Using Nonparametric IRT (CT 04-05)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Investigating the Quality of Items in CAT Using Nonparametric IRT (CT 04-05) - Executive Summary
- Investigating the Quality of Items in CAT Using Nonparametric IRT (CT 04-05) - Full Research Report (PDF)
A Method for Determining the Maximum Number of Nonoverlapping Linear Test Forms That Can Be Assembled From an Item Pool (CT 03-04)
by Ronald Armstrong, Rutgers Business School, Newark/New Brunswick, Rutgers University; and Dmitry Belov, Law School Admission Council
- A Method for Determining the Maximum Number of Nonoverlapping Linear Test Forms That Can Be Assembled From an Item Pool (CT 03-04) - Executive Summary
- A Method for Determining the Maximum Number of Nonoverlapping Linear Test Forms That Can Be Assembled From an Item Pool (CT 03-04) - Full Research Report (PDF)
A Method to Determine Targets for Multi-Stage Adaptive Tests (CT 02-07)
by Ronald Armstrong, Rutgers University; and Louis Roussos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- A Method to Determine Targets for Multi-Stage Adaptive Tests (CT 02-07) - Executive Summary
- A Method to Determine Targets for Multi-Stage Adaptive Tests (CT 02-07) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Modeling Nonignorable Missing Data Processes in Item Calibration (CT 04-07)
by Cees A. W. Glas and Jonald L. Pimentel, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Modeling Nonignorable Missing Data Processes in Item Calibration (CT 04-07) - Executive Summary
- Modeling Nonignorable Missing Data Processes in Item Calibration (CT 04-07) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Normal Models for Response Times on Test Items (CT 04-08)
by Wim J. van der Linden, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Normal Models for Response Times on Test Items (CT 04-08) - Executive Summary
- Normal Models for Response Times on Test Items (CT 04-08) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Robustness of Person-Fit Decisions in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-06)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Robustness of Person-Fit Decisions in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-06) - Executive Summary
- Robustness of Person-Fit Decisions in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-06) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Routing Rules for Multiple-Form Structures (CT 02-08)
by Ronald D. Armstrong, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University
- Routing Rules for Multiple-Form Structures (CT 02-08) - Executive Summary
- Routing Rules for Multiple-Form Structures (CT 02-08) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Survey and Usability Testing Results of the Analytical Reasoning Computerized Prototype at the 2000 Law School Recruitment Forums (CT 02-01)
by Kimberly A. Swygert, Susan P. Dalessandro, and Mike Contreras
- Survey and Usability Testing Results of the Analytical Reasoning Computerized Prototype at the 2000 Law School Recruitment Forums (CT 02-01) - Executive Summary
- Survey and Usability Testing Results of the Analytical Reasoning Computerized Prototype at the 2000 Law School Recruitment Forums (CT 02-01) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Using Patterns of Summed Scores in Paper-and-Pencil Tests and CAT to Detect Misfitting Item Score Patterns (CT 02-04)
by Rob R. Meijer, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Using Patterns of Summed Scores in Paper-and-Pencil Tests and CAT to Detect Misfitting Item Score Patterns (CT 02-04) - Executive Summary
- Using Patterns of Summed Scores in Paper-and-Pencil Tests and CAT to Detect Misfitting Item Score Patterns (CT 02-04) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Violations of Ignorability in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-04)
by Cees A. W. Glas, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Violations of Ignorability in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-04) - Executive Summary
- Violations of Ignorability in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CT 04-04) - Full Research Report (PDF)
Archived Computerized Testing Reports
LSAC has archived all Computerized Testing Reports that were published ten or more years ago. These reports are still available upon request.
Why not? (Provide additional feedback below. NOTE: If you have a question or concern regarding your specific circumstances, please go to the Contact Us page.)
Please enter a comment.
Thank you for your feedback.
Get Adobe Reader to view PDFs indicated on this site by (PDF)
