Research Reports

Application of Robust Optimization to Automated Test Assembly (RR 12-02)

In automated test assembly (ATA), 0-1 linear programming (0-1 LP) methods are applied to select questions (items) from an item bank to assemble an optimal test. The objective in this 0-1 LP optimization problem is to assemble a test that measures, in as precise a way as possible, the ability of candidates. Item response theory (IRT) is commonly applied to model the relationship between the responses of candidates and their ability level. Parameters that describe the characteristics of each item, such as difficulty level and the extent to which an item differentiates between more and less able test takers (discrimination) are estimated in the application of the IRT model. Unfortunately, since all parameters in IRT models have to be estimated, they do have a level of uncertainty to them. Some of the other parameters in the test assembly model, such as average response times, have been estimated with uncertainty as well. General 0-1 LP methods do not take this uncertainty into account, and overestimate the predicted level of measurement precision. In this paper, alternative robust optimization methods are applied. It is demonstrated how the Bertsimas and Sim method can be applied to take this uncertainty into account in ATA. The impact of applying this method is illustrated in two numerical examples. Implications are discussed, and some directions for future research are presented.

Request the full report

Additional reports in this collection

researchers study paperwork and examine charts and figures on a tablet

Evidence to Support Validity Claims for Using LSAT Scores...

Law School Admission Test (LSAT) scores provide a standard measure of an applicant’s proficiency in a well-defined set of important skills associated with success in law school coursework. LSAT scores are also a strong predictor of first-year grades (FYG) and cumulative grade point average (CGPA) in law school. The most recent correlational study of LSAT results (2019) shows that LSAT scores are far superior to undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) in predicting FYG...

Understanding and Interpreting Law School Enrollment Data...

The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) has a long-standing commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion in legal education and in the legal profession. In line with its mission to promote quality, access, and equity in legal education, LSAC is providing this report, Understanding and Interpreting Law School Enrollment Data: A Focus on Race and Ethnicity, to help law schools, admission professionals, and other legal education stakeholders understand how we are measuring who is the pipeline.