Researching on tablet

Research Library

All reports in LSAC’s Research Library are available upon request. Executive summaries are available below for the latest LSAT Technical Reports and other research published within the last 10 years.

Looking for older reports? Consult the Research Archive

Current Research:

In a first of its kind report, LSAC and NALP examine the student perspective of accelerated recruiting, disruptions to the 1L curriculum, and the inequities such practices may perpetuate regarding access to Big Law careers.
This report focuses on first-year law school enrollment from 2021 through 2025, highlighting who is enrolling in law school, where they enrolled, and how rates of enrollment of racially and ethnically minoritized students varied across law schools.

Prelaw advisors at undergraduate institutions serve a vital role in higher education and the legal profession, guiding people through one of the most consequential decisions of their lives: whether to pursue a law degree. Their advisees come to them with questions about where to apply, how to present themselves as applicants, and where to attend. Advisors perform this work under significant institutional constraints, such as a lack of time, funding, or other support.

As predictive validity is an important component in the overall evaluation of test validity, LSAC has carried out predictive validity studies, also called LSAT Correlation Studies, since the test was first administered.
This report focuses on 2024-25 applicants, exploring who applied to law school, when applicants first thought about law school, why they applied, and more.
This report provides insight into how students with disabilities in the 2024-2025 1L class navigated the law school application process.
In an analysis of 2024-2025 test taker data, the LSAC research team provides insights into when test takers first thought about going to law school, what motivates them to pursue law school, and more.
This report provides important insights that law schools and stakeholders can use to support student retention and development in law school and beyond.
What funding sources did the 2024 1L class use to pay for law school? How much debt do they expect to have when they graduate?
This report focuses on the 2024 1L class, examining who is enrolling in law school, where they enrolled, and how they made their enrollment decision.
This report focuses on first-year law school enrollment from 2021 through 2024, highlighting who is enrolling in law school, where they enrolled, and how rates of enrollment of racially and ethnically minoritized students varied across law schools.
Based on survey responses from 2023 law school matriculants, this report provides nuanced information about factors that affect law school decision-making processes for students with disabilities.
This report focuses on the 2023 1L class, examining who is enrolling in law school, where they enrolled, and how they made their enrollment decision.
Through the Post LSAT Questionnaire, future law applicants provide numerous insights for how to better support and promote their aspirations. This report, the first in a series, focuses on how 2023-2024 test takers see their path to a legal education.
An in-depth look at how law schools are supporting LGBTQ+ individuals through their legal education journey.
This report summarizes recent trends in LSAT performance and includes breakdowns by test takers’ country, U.S. region, gender, race and ethnicity, repeater status, and disability status.
Based on survey responses from 2022 law school matriculants, this report provides nuanced information about factors that affect law school decision-making processes for students with disabilities.
The LSAC Research team has issued a first-of-its-kind report offering a highly nuanced perspective on how law schools support LGBTQ+ students.
By Elizabeth Bodamer and Debra Langer

A Foundation of Validity

Beginning with the very first notion of a standardized test for admission to law school, validity was a primary focus. In his May 17, 1945 letter to the College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) suggesting the development of such a test, Frank H. Bowles, Director of Admissions at Columbia University, stated the seven criteria listed below.

In this piece published in the Association of American Law Schools’ Journal of Legal Education, LSAC DEI Policy & Research Analyst and Senior Program Manager Elizabeth Bodamer explores the experiences of minoritized students in U.S. law schools.