Research Reports

After Tenure: Post-Tenure Law Professors in the United States (GR 11-02)

The After Tenure study, jointly funded by the American Bar Foundation and the Law School Admission Council, is the first in-depth examination of the professional lives of post-tenure law professors in the United States. It combines a national survey of post-tenure law professors with a set of follow-up interviews conducted with a subset of the survey respondents. A total of 1,175 professors completed the survey; an additional 49 answered substantial parts of the survey. Their responses provide the basis of this report, which contains descriptive statistics from the first quantitative analyses. Future reports and articles will provide further quantitative and qualitative results.

Initial findings show that tenured law professors are generally satisfied with their work situations, but that minority professors and white female professors are significantly more likely to be unhappy. Additional findings included in this report give a detailed picture of the post-tenure law professoriate in terms of geography, age, parents’ educational levels, religion, school status, and many other factors. For example, a high proportion of law professors’ parents have pursued postgraduate education, even though a substantial minority of law professors come from less privileged backgrounds. The majority of the nation’s law professors teach in private schools, and more than 38% teach in the 50 top-ranked law schools (out of 187 then-accredited law schools). Despite some disparities in satisfaction and patterns of social interaction, a high percentage of tenured law professors from all demographic backgrounds reported feeling loyal to the law schools at which they taught.

Addendum

July 2012 Addendum

Request the full report

Additional reports in this collection

researchers study paperwork and examine charts and figures on a tablet

Evidence to Support Validity Claims for Using LSAT Scores...

Law School Admission Test (LSAT) scores provide a standard measure of an applicant’s proficiency in a well-defined set of important skills associated with success in law school coursework. LSAT scores are also a strong predictor of first-year grades (FYG) and cumulative grade point average (CGPA) in law school. The most recent correlational study of LSAT results (2019) shows that LSAT scores are far superior to undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) in predicting FYG...

Understanding and Interpreting Law School Enrollment Data...

The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) has a long-standing commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion in legal education and in the legal profession. In line with its mission to promote quality, access, and equity in legal education, LSAC is providing this report, Understanding and Interpreting Law School Enrollment Data: A Focus on Race and Ethnicity, to help law schools, admission professionals, and other legal education stakeholders understand how we are measuring who is the pipeline.